Okay, I know this entry is a little too late. I’ve watched the movie since almost a week ago and I’m only blogging about it now. But then again, there were so many goings on these days right?
You know, the reason anyone ever bother to blog about a movie they’ve watched is either because the movie is darn good or hell bad. Well, movie critics and bloggers who dedicate their blogs to movie reviews excepted.
Anyway, in the case of Eragon, sadly, I’ll have to say it’s WAAAAAAAAYYYYYY disappointing. It always happens isn’t it? If I read the book first I’ll always end up feeling disappointed. There was HP3 and now it’s Eragon. Narnia was a bit disappointing too because of all the hype that blew it all up, but then again, I’ve not read C.S. Lewis in my entire life.
I think the whole Narnia thing was probably because I was comparing it to LOTR. You see, LOTR was the first fantasy genre movie that I’ve ever watched and I think it’s agreeable that it is also THE fantasy movie.
And so, I’ve always imagined a similar type of directorship for Eragon whenever I read the book and dream of it being made into a movie. Well, my dream came true but it was exactly the opposite of what I had expected it to be.
Probably the only similarity of the movie and my imagination is how Carvahall would look like. And I have no comments on Sienna Guillory who played the elf Arya. She is kinda hot, but a bit too short for my imagination. And the fact that I compared her to Liz Tyler just wasn’t too fair ain’t it? Somehow, I feel that Liz Tyler (Arwen in LOTR) has set the standard for future Elven Princesses after LOTR.
Anyways, the similarities just stopped there. The most frustrating thing is that the movie was totally out of the chronology of events in the book. For one thing, Eragon was 15 NOT 17 as mentioned in the movie. And Saphira grew gradually. If you were to follow her growth curve (forgive the Microbiology me) you will see a exponential growth. She did have a growth spurt, but it happened in months. In the movie, little Saphira flew into the sky, got struck by lightning and then POOF!
Cute Little Saphira became HUGE ENORMOUS flying lizard.
How fake is that?
And Saphira’s wings are NOT feathered. It’s supposed to be leathery like bats, not like birds. That’s important because it signifies the weak part of a seemingly invulnerable beast. If you have a pair of feathered wings, obviously arrows are just like sticks flying through leaves. But if it’s a piece of thin membrane, it’s a different kind of story.
There were other expects of the movie that were so different that I really felt like I’m watching an entirely different story. For example, Galbatorix was not even shown as a character in the story. He doesn’t have any dialogue, only described. In the movie, he’s not even ruthless. His dialogues made him childish. Seriously, if I’m Eragon, I would have given him a pacifier.
And then, Brom was soooooo not what I expected him to be like. In the book, he’s this great war veteran who’s brave and all. In the movie, he’s a CHICKEN! And he’s not killed by Durza! He’s killed by the Ra’zac! And he don’t give Za’aroc to Eragon right before he died. He gave it to him at the moment he met Saphira. And Saphira never knew she can change his grave into a diamond tomb until she did it.
Then, Murtagh, he had NEVER intended to go to the Varden. In the movie, he was lapping at the Varden’s door like a dog. And what happened to the Evil Twins in the Varden? All I see is one old man who is sooooo good. He doesn’t even seem the slightest bad. And the dwarves? Where are they?
And Ajihad did not recognize Murtagh by just LOOKING at him. That’s soooo not logical even to those who didn’t read the book. How can you recognize someone you’ve not even met?! And by the way, Ajihad is NOT pronounced as AjiHAD. It’s AJIHOD. It’s shown at the back of the book. That just shows how much the director loved the book.
Farthen Dur is just not beautiful. And Saphira never breathed fire until at the very end of the war. In the battle with Durza, it was ERAGON who was almost mortally wounded, not SAPHIRA. I now begin to wonder how they are gonna explain the torment of Eragon’s scar in the second movie when there’s not even one. Is it gonna be Saphira’s scar instead?
I could have pointed out even more stuff but I don’t wanna sound even more like a whiner, which I already am.
Sigh. I guess I’m expecting too much. But if Peter Jackson can do such a good job on LOTR, why can’t the director of Eragon? Directors that wanna do movie adaptations from books MUST love the books. It wouldn’t work if the director is just filming it for the sake of money. Like Eragon, it will just turn out to be a piece of chronologically mixed up crap even if dozens of Christopher Paolini’s are present at the set.
I was reading MPH’s Quill magazine’s promotion about the film the other day. I couldn’t agree more with the article’s final line: Make sure you read the book before you catch the movie.
Because if you don’t, you wouldn’t even wanna look at the book cover.